This page presents examples of bipoles that are compliant with bictiopedia standards, but defined quite informally but with different sintactic and aggrupating displays to showcase flexibility and more or less further modelled with more categories to showcase extendability.
These bipoles themselves are used for explaining and or justifying parts of the bictiopedia project itself.
A display of a minimal and deep enough structure for a sample item. This estructure is not applied in fullth to any of the bipoles shown here in this page, but you can see it applied to a fundamental set scaled up to a set of 5 bipoles in a webpage, here, and also in a .pdf dump of almost 100 bipoles, here.
One of the broadest possible keypairs, very useful to understand the explanative power of bipoling, specially at higher realms…
Yet one more very difficult item to define… made simple
Below, the 3 bipoles shown at the homepage for introducing the project:
You are always a polar part of the thruth you try approaching
Let’s interpret the excluded middle principle-law as a centroids exclusivizing medium
Analitical Informatics and Us perhaps have equilibred different talents for finding meaning